Blog #10

I read a case a while ago about abortion rights in Kansas. They passed a law prohibiting second trimester abortions but that challenged the state constitution so it wasn’t passed. Citizens and policy makers felt that this called for a revision in the state constitution so it was taken to court. The Washington Post mentioned that this case provided “a pathway to override restrictive state laws elsewhere”. The court ruled in favor of the state which meant that laws couldn’t be passed regarding abortions since the state constitution gave women the right to choose. I think this is interesting considering the fact that the idea of amending or challenging a state constitution would be to update it. I thought that it would be for progress towards the kind of America that we live in today. But it kind of seems like this case was backtracking. It wasn’t for progress, it was fighting for regression and that kind of shocked me.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog #12

Blog #11

Blog #16